Scratch+assessment

flat =Investigate=

5-6

 * Comprehensive brainstorm
 * At least three different sources are used. The information from the sources are  evaluated
 * Case study is highly detailed with  screen shots of games complete with short notes.
 * Design specification contains at least 4 relevant pts
 * Very well written bibliography following MLA guidelines

3-4

 * Attempts to do brainstorming
 * At least two different sources are used. Some of the sources are evaluated
 * Case study contains some details. Short notes  included.
 * Design specification contains at least 3 relevant pts
 * Bibliography included, some essential elements are missing.

1-2

 * Brainstorming not present
 * Some sources are used. Evaluation of sources missing
 * Very rudimentary case study.
 * Attempts to write design specification
 * Very poorly written Bibliography

0

 * No evidence of achievement

=Design=

5-6

 * At least three different designs( story boards ) are given
 * Each design is compared with the design specifications
 * The reasons for the selection of a particular design are clearly given

3-4

 * At least two different designs(story boards) are given
 * Some designs are compared with the design specifications
 * The reasons for the selection of a particular design are not properly given

1-2

 * At least one design(story board) is given
 * Comparison of designs with the design specifications missing
 * The reasons for the selection of a particular design are missing

0

 * No evidence of achievement

=Plan=

5-6

 * Produces a step by step plan that contains a number of understandable steps.
 * A time line is present with the scale clearly marked .( Gantt chart )
 * A list of material /software/hardware requirements with the quantity required is given.

3-4

 * Produces a step by step plan that contains some understandable steps.
 * A time line is present (Gantt chart) necessary markings missing.
 * A list of material /software/hardware requirements given.

1-2

 * Step by step plan lack necessary details.
 * An attempt to make a time line.
 * A list of some of the materials/software/hardware requirements  given

0

 * No evidence of achievement

=Create=

5-6

 * Product is clear example of what was planned (visually appealing and interesting computer game).
 * A high level of skill has been demonstrated working with  hardware / software
 * Detailed process journal with dated journal entries and images/screen shots showing evidence of the creation process.
 * Journal entries follows the prescribed format

3-4

 * Product is a good example of what was planned.
 * A good level of skill has been demonstrated working with  hardware / software
 * Process journal with dated journal entries and images /screen shots showing evidence of the creation process.
 * Journal entries present

1-2

 * Product is a moderate example of what was planned.
 * Moderate level of skill has been demonstrated working with hardware/software.
 * rudimentary process journal

0

 * No evidence of achievement

=Evaluate=

5-6

 * A thorough and well set out evaluation that comprehensively:
 * evaluates quality of finished product
 * evaluates product as compared to design specification
 * evaluates any modifications or improvements that could be made to product
 * Evaluates performance of student in each stages of the Design Cycle and suggests improvements that could be made.

3-4

 * A moderate evaluation  that attempts to :
 * evaluate quality of finished product
 * evaluate product as compared to design specification
 * evaluate any modifications or improvements that could be made to product
 * Evaluate performance of student in some stages of the Design Cycle

1-2

 * Incomplete evaluation
 * of the quality of the finished product
 * of the product compared to the design specification
 * of the performance of student in all the stages of the Design Cycle.

0

 * No evidence of achievement

=Attitude in technology=

5-6
The student always displays:


 * safe working habits
 * a high level of involvement in the learning process
 * a collaborative approach to tasks carried out in the class/ laboratory
 * an independent and resourceful approach to his/her work
 * a high level of organisation

3-4
The student displayed:


 * safe working habits
 * a good level of involvement in the learning process
 * a collaborative approach to tasks carried out in the class /laboratory
 * an independent approach to his/her work
 * a good level of organisation

1-2
The student displayed an inconsistent level of:


 * safe working habits
 * involvement in class
 * collaboration with peers
 * working independently
 * organisation

0

 * No evidence of achievement